blog posts

May 23

Written by: James Burke
23 May 2010 18:09  RssIcon

You left the Ark where? by nickgoesglobal, on Flickr

The term "curation" appears to be on the rise lately in many web, iPhone and iPad applications emerging and mainstream blog articles being published such as “Why Content Curation is Here to Stay” and “Curators of the Real-Time Web: Distilling the chatter to relevant, actionable information” although this is not showing up too much yet on google trends.

User Generated Content (UGC) has become the "norm" in many web2.0 and post web2.0 applications where text, images, audio, video etc. is openly shared and licenced with licences such as Creative Commons or freely shared via the "embed" where legal reuse and repurposing rights and obligations can sometimes be difficult to ascertain due to that lack of an adopted content licence.

RSS is well established for sharing a "collection" of resources from a single source and OPML is gaining adoption for "collections" of resources from multiple sources. On the real-time-web front protocols such as PubSubHubbub allow the real-time publishing of feeds but the usefulness and relevance of these feeds appears to be sparking a new area of interest in web apps.

One aspect of "Web 3.0" could be seen as the "return of the expert" and the rise and validation of the "subject matter expert" where their curated "works" is seen as holding value over and above other people and their collections due to them having more contextual social capital or "whuffie".

The newspaper "revenue crunch" and move to "paid for content" behind the paywall needs creators and curators of content that have a high level of social capital in order to survive.

Wikipedia is the current stalwart of edited crowdsourced collective intelligence although there are many other upcoming sources around such as google Knol which relies on Subject Matter Experts accepting crowdsourced contributions but ultimately relying on an individual (the SME) acting as the sole arbitrator to a "content object". All of Wikipedia's content is licenced with Creative Commons cc-by-sa licences as is the vast majority of google Knol content.

On the real-time web and micro blogging front "curation" primarily relates to twitter favourites (able to monitor and review via RSS) and lists which can be aggregated into OPML feeds for importing into personal homepages such as NetVibes. RSS feeds is the main protocol for accessing other realtime status update feeds from applications such as facebook, buzz, linkedin etc.

The Difference Engine (@differenceengin - see previous post on launch of programme) appears to have a startup emerging from it's first cohort (led by @basti and @sampicli) that is embracing "curation" with their curated.by application - more to be announced this week in the final week of this programme and at @thinkingdigital conference workshops.

"Curation", in the educational context, can relate to the "everybody has something to learn and everybody has something to teach" saying as the School of Everything strapline goes. Current web savvy users share links on facebook, twitter etc., engage in conversation and dialogue via blog comments, friendfeed, buzz, wave etc., articulate considered thoughts via blogs using wordpress and microblogs using posterous etc., and vote on and "like" "links" and content via facebook and digg etc. - all of this is essentially engagement around a "social object" as @gapingvoid calls it. All of this sharing is directly relevant to the area of e-portfolio's / personal learning environments etc.

We are currently in the "Wild West" as @jobsworth states in relation to privacy and sharing but there is a huge opportunity to curate, collate and legally share (e.g. @doctorow books that can be downloaded for free using licencing regimes such as Creative Commons) content that is contextually related and has relevance and utility to the end user and to discover a ROI from this curation activity.

It's early days on the "curation" front but it is looking like it could be the "new black" for the remainder of 2010...!

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic License flickr photo by nickgoesglobal 

twitter tags: curation

8 comment(s) so far...


Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black"...!?

I have to agree - certainly 'curation' is a bit of a preoccupation of mine at the moment - mainly due to the importance of it in the next round of JISC funding for OERs (www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/funding_calls/2010/04/grant0610.aspx) and I have been watching with interest as a mix of technological and people-powered solutions start to spring up.

I think the Google Prediction API and things like RDFa are going to offer some clues to intelligent filtering but also that there is going to be a continued role for expert curators..

By Matt Jukes on   23 May 2010 19:24
Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black"...!?

I am looking with interest for signs of how people can afford to be professional curators of Web content. I am also curious as to what people consider to be "curation." It is worth bearing in mind that the word 'curation' exists because there are professionals already who do it.
I have, in effect, been (amongst other things) a curator of digital material for many years now. I have been quietly embedding semantic metadata and trying to find ways of conserving material.
I have said (and will say again at greater length) that there are many who could learn much from heritage/culture professionals. It could be a good time to consider paying for the services of or advice from professional culture curators.

By Janet E Davis on   23 May 2010 19:42
Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black"...!?

Janet, I'm not sure if Tony Hirst (@psychemedia) has covered this in his recent "Infoskills for Digital Librarians" but blog.ouseful.info/2010/05/20/imaginings-around-infoskills-for-digital-librarians/ worth a look as a starting point.

Would also be interested in what "curation" means beyond classification and in different disciplines & sectors etc.

By James Burke on   23 May 2010 19:59
Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black"...!?

Your comment last comment regarding 'what "curation" means beyond classification' is the heart of the matter, I think. People do not even understand that there are skills, knowledge, standards - and even ethics involved.
As the quantity of Web content grows, we will need people to find the interesting and good quality content. Not everyone has the time or patience to work through 100 pages or more of Google search results ( as I do when doing serious research).
And the problem with classification (and Web directories) is that they rarely classify in the way that the individual expects. There are answers to this but I'm not sure that the people who might have the money to develop the solutions understand the issues yet.
Thanks for writing such a thought-provoking post.

By Janet E Davis on   23 May 2010 20:29
Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black"...!?

interesting... ties in with another thread I am reading at the moment about the internet being like a library, and one person has just commented it far less organised... ie curated.
podnosh.com/blog/2010/05/22/is-that-on-google-or-the-internet/

By cyberdoyle on   23 May 2010 21:07
Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black"...!?

Another interesting take on the "curation" of other peoples content worth a look is www.lazyfeed.com/about

By James Burke on   23 May 2010 21:46
Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black"...!?

The term does keep cropping up and I think you're right that, as an emerging theme, we're going to see a lot more of it.

I guess where we start with Curation is the notion that individuals often bring a different set of expertise to a problem than a single expert can - kind of the essence of crowdsourcing, but not quite the same.

So what we are looking to do with Curatr is to maintain the provenance of resources with the presence of a "Curator" - an expert who can be trusted and referred too - but also allow for UGC and others to develop their "take" on the content.

Ben @ Curatr

By Ben Betts on   24 May 2010 08:39
Gravatar

Re: Curation is the "new black" ... !?

Yes Curation is cropping up more & more - see bit.ly/bDPzwV - this refers to the increasing availability of data but also stresses the need for 'curators' or 'explainers' to help us make sense of the data. In a learning context there is no shortage of information from which we can learn (or teach) but without the curation from the professional or credible amateur curator we may be in danger of simply drowning in information. So curation should be welcomed by creators as without it there is a danger that much of the content can lie 'unharvested' but for the curator adding value in the form of context and interpretation. Interesting that Steve Rosenbaum in the mashable post, linked to by @deburca in his post, says: "creators should have the ability to create boundaries, both editorial and economic, around what they create and how it is repurposed." Would, boundaries that the creators may set, at their discretion, by the use of Creative Commons licences, offer sufficient comfort to them? The answer to that is more than likely: it depends...

By Joscelyn on   24 May 2010 16:15

Your name:
Gravatar Preview
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment   Cancel 
dotnetnuke